nine . Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The legislation enjoins the police being scrupulously fair for the offender plus the Magistracy is to be sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court and from other courts Nevertheless they have failed to have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The a good amount of this power casts an obligation about the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.
The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The plenty of this power casts an obligation around the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for the crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Read more
Since the Supreme Court would be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has actually been attained, therefore the decision from the Supreme Court needs to get taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) of your Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
Acquittal nullifies prior guilt and fortifies petitioners' eligibility for appointment. No juridical impediment to appointment following acquittal. Equivalence of acquittals under compromise and criminal procedure code, as well as role of "badal-i-sulh" in restorative justice. Distinction between probationary release and acquittal. Probationary release for a legally acknowledged conviction. Read more
This is because transfer orders are typically regarded within the administrative discretion with the employer. However, there could possibly be exceptions in cases where the transfer is motivated by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, They might have grounds to challenge before the suitable forum. Read more
As the Supreme Court may be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has become arrived at, therefore the decision of your Supreme Court needs to become taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) of your Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
Summaries offer a concise insight into the realm of dispute resolution exterior traditional court proceedings. In Pakistan, arbitration serves as a vital alternative for resolving commercial conflicts quickly and competently.
168 . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Topic: Appeal At times it can be hassle-free for a Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under the obligation for making an attempt to dispose of a case on benefit and more importantly when after recording of evidence it's got attained to the stage of here final arguments, endeavors should be made for merit disposal when it's attained these types of stage. Read more
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming into the main case, It's also a properly-established proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is subject into the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to reach at its independent findings over the evidence.
Article 27 of your Constitution does not only safeguard against discrimination with the time of appointment of service but after the appointment also. The disparity from the pay out scale allowances of Stenographers while in the District Judiciary is from the distinct negation of your legislation laid down through the Supreme Court in its a variety of pronouncements. Read more
162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It can be very well-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within ninety times. If your appeal will not be decided within that timeframe, he/she will then solution the service tribunal to challenge the original order. Once they are doing so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, because the 90 times for that department to act has already expired. On the aforesaid proposition, we're guided from the decision on the Supreme Court during the case of Dr.
Problems or Errors If you encounter any technical problems with this website (for instance a lousy link or maybe a portion of the opinion missing), please notify the eService Center.
If that judgment goes to appeal, the appellate court will have the chance to review both the precedent as well as case under appeal, Potentially overruling the previous case regulation by setting a completely new precedent of higher authority. This may well come about several times as being the case works its way through successive appeals. Lord Denning, first with the High Court of Justice, later from the Court of Appeal, provided a famous example of this evolutionary process in his progress in the concept of estoppel starting within the High Trees case.
The Court directed the Chief Secretary of Sindh to make sure the Act's effective implementation in line with its unique purpose and called for educational programs Bachelor degree(s) in the subject of cooperative societies. Read more